Skip to main contentSkip to footer

Prince Andrew responds to claims he refused to co-operate with US authorities in Jeffrey Epstein investigation

The Duke of York's legal team has responded

prince andrew solo
Danielle Stacey
Online Royal CorrespondentLondon
Share this:

The Duke of York has responded to claims that he refused to co-operate with the US Department of Justice's (DOJ) investigation into disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew's legal team, Blackfords, released a lengthy statement on Monday saying that the 60-year-old royal had offered to assist the DOJ three times this year and the authority first requested his help on 2 January.

Andrew's lawyers also claim that the "DOJ has reacted to the first two offers by breaching their own confidentiality rules and claiming that the Duke has offered zero co-operation".

The Queen's second son stepped back from royal duties in November 2019, following his TV interview with BBC Newsnight, which focused on his connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

READ: Prince Charles's very surprising new title revealed!

prince andrew and the queen© Photo: Getty Images

Andrew stepped back from royal duties last year

The statement from the Duke of York's legal team reads, in full: "In January 2020, Blackfords LLP and instructed counsel, Clare Montgomery QC and Stephen Ferguson, were commissioned to support HRH The Duke of York in his desire to provide cooperation to the US authorities regarding the victims of the late Jeffrey Epstein, should those authorities request his assistance. The working group is supported by Riverside Advisory on media relations.

"To date, we have chosen not to make any public statement regarding our discussions with the US Department of Justice (DOJ). Our commitment to confidentiality is not only regarded as best practice in the UK but is also intended to respect the DOJ's commitment to confidentiality, as set out in its own rules as they apply to discussions with potential witnesses.

"However, in view of misleading media briefings, we owe it to our client to issue this clarifying statement.

"As the public record indicates the DOJ has been actively investigating Mr Epstein and other targets for more than 16 years, yet the first time they requested the Duke's help was on 2nd January 2020.

"Importantly, the DOJ advised us that the Duke is not and has never been a 'target' of their criminal investigations into Epstein and that they sought his confidential, voluntary cooperation.

MORE: The 3 life lessons Sophie Wessex has learnt from The Queen

the queen prince andrew rare appearance church© Photo: Getty Images

Andrew with the Queen at church in January 2020

"In the course of these discussions, we asked the DOJ to confirm that our co-operation and any interview arrangements would remain confidential, in accordance with the ordinary rules that apply to voluntary co-operation with the DOJ. We were given an unequivocal assurance that our discussions and the interview process would remain confidential.

"The Duke of York has on at least three occasions this year offered his assistance as a witness to the DOJ. Unfortunately, the DOJ has reacted to the first two offers by breaching their own confidentiality rules and claiming that the Duke has offered zero co-operation. In doing so, they are perhaps seeking publicity rather than accepting the assistance proffered.

"On 27th January 2020, Mr Geoffrey S Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, chose to make a public statement about the Duke. This led to worldwide media reports that there had been 'a wall of silence' and that there had been 'zero co-operation' by the Duke. These statements were inaccurate, and they should not have been made.

"On 9th March 2020, Mr Berman made further public statements saying that the Duke had 'completely shut the door' on co-operating with the US investigation and that they are now 'considering' further options'. Again, the first statement was inaccurate and should not have been made.

MORE: The Queen reveals new picture of Prince William volunteering with Prince George and Princess Charlotte

andrew interview© Photo: PA

Andrew during the BBC Newsnight interview in November 2019

"It is a matter of regret that the DOJ has seen fit to breach its own rules of confidentiality, not least as they are designed to encourage witness cooperation. Far from our client acting above the law, as has been implied by press briefings in the US, he is being treated by a lower standard than might reasonably be expected for any other citizen. Further, those same breaches of confidentiality by the DOJ have given the global media - and, therefore, the worldwide audience - an entirely misleading account of our discussions with them.

"Any pursuit of an application for mutual legal assistance would be disappointing, since the Duke of York is not a target of the DOJ investigation and has recently repeated his willingness to provide a witness statement. It is hoped that this third offer has not been the cause of the most recent leak about the Duke of York. We do not intend to make any further public statement at this time as we wish to respect the rules of confidentiality under both English law and the US guidelines."

Prince Andrew issued a statement in November 2019 when he confirmed he would be stepping back from royal duties, saying: "I have asked Her Majesty if I may step back from public duties for the foreseeable future, and she has given her permission. I continue to unequivocally regret my ill-judged association with Jeffrey Epstein. 

"His suicide has left many unanswered questions, particularly for his victims, and I deeply sympathise with everyone who has been affected and wants some form of closure. I can only hope that, in time, they will be able to rebuild their lives. Of course, I am willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations, if required."

Make sure you never miss a ROYAL story! Sign up to our newsletter to get all of our celebrity, royal and lifestyle news delivered directly to your inbox.

More Royalty

See more