Did you know that we launched The HELLO! Royal Club on Substack last year?
Every week, we share two newsletters plus a roster of other posts for our free and paid subscribers. So, if you want to keep up with all the latest royal goings-on and get access to exclusive paywalled content, join the club.
Here's an extract from today's post looking at royal photographers' differing perspectives on Princess Kate's much talked about, edited Mother's Day photo.
© Kensington PalaceOne of the photographers who I spoke to was Ben Stansall, who works at AFP, one of the first international agencies who issued a "kill notice" on the royal portrait.
Ben, by the way, has covered Prince William and Kate's 'crazy' 2010 engagement photoshoot, the births of Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, and more recently, the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II.
"There are a few different areas of the image which look like they've been doctored," Ben told me. "The zip on Kate's top, Charlotte's sleeve, Charlotte's hair. Things have clearly been added or removed from the image.
"So the Princess' photo goes beyond what we call 'dark room' techniques, which are brightening up or dulling down the image a little, if needed. But really, that is all that would happen.
"Adding or removing something to or from an image is a real no-go area, because that essentially is deceiving the client. We have a fact-checking service at AFP, which verifies all the content we provide to verify its authenticity.
"If the Princess was using this photo for her social media or personal use, then that's fine. But if you're giving it to the global media who have ethical responsibilities to their clients, then really, you should respect those."
© GettySo what should the Princess have done? Ben shared his suggestion for how Kate could have avoided this photo-editing scandal.
"I guess the purpose of this image was to quell any rumours about the Princess's health, but in doctoring an image and giving it to the world's media, I think all they've done is increase the uncertainty and added to the rumour mill. They've certainly not helped their situation," Ben said.
"I suppose you either do it authentically or you just don't do it at all. If they felt the need to put out a picture, then they should have released one that was authentic, whether that included the Princess in the image or not.
"Just as easily, she could have taken a picture of the children and said, 'Hi everyone, I'm feeling better. I'm up and about playing with my camera. Here's a picture of the kids.' That perhaps, would have been a better idea. But again, we don't know whether this was her decision entirely or whether it was suggested. So it's really impossible to say, isn't it?"
We hope you enjoyed reading this taster of our Royal Club post. To read it in full, head to the HELLO! Royal Club and sign up to become a member.
LOVE THE ROYALS? JOIN THE CLUB!
If you are reading this, the chances are you are obsessed with all things royalty – which is just as well because so are we! So obsessed, in fact, we’ve launched a club solely dedicated to covering them. So welcome to The HELLO! Royal Club. We would love you to join us there…
What is it?
Interactive community offering behind-the-scenes access, exclusive royal interviews, unmissable royal insights, and an illustrious royal Inner Circle.
Member benefits
- Two weekly newsletters, one from Emily Nash
- Video posts and audio notes from Emily Nash and the HELLO! Royal team
- Access to our royal community and opportunity to interact with club writers and members
- Participate in polls, comments and discussion threads
- Access to our Ask Me Anything sessions with our journalists
- Invitations to in-person and virtual events
- A subscription to the digital edition of HELLO! Magazine (Worth £82 annually)*
- Future ‘Inner Circle’ benefits
By royal decree
You are royally invited to join The HELLO! Royal Club – and then to go forth and spread the word to your fellow royal fans. See you in the club!
